Alarming Gomati DM Controversy Sparks Outrage Among TIPRA Leaders in Tripura

Tripura, May 28, 2025 — A serious Gomati DM controversy has erupted in Tripura, as senior leaders of the TIPRA Motha Party, including Minister of State for Industries and Commerce Brishaketu Debbarma and Chief Executive Member (CEM) of TTAADC Purna Chandra Jamatia, have formally submitted a complaint to the Chief Secretary, JK Sinha. The letter, dated May 27, 2025, calls for an immediate inquiry into the conduct of T.K. Chakma, IAS, the District Magistrate and Collector of Gomati District.

TIPRA Leaders File Formal Complaint Over Gomati DM Controversy

The complaint accuses T.K. Chakma of “serious administrative misconduct” and failing to engage with elected officials over urgent public concerns in Gomati. The Gomati DM controversy has sent ripples through the state’s administrative and political machinery, with the TIPRA leadership alleging blatant disrespect and lack of accountability from the district’s top bureaucrat.

According to the leaders, Chakma’s refusal to meet with key public representatives — including Hon’ble Maharaja Kirit Pradyot Debbarma, Chairman of the AARC and TTAADC — during their visit to his Udaipur residence on May 25, was not only “unacceptable” but also indicative of a deeper issue of administrative apathy.

Allegations Include Ignoring Calls, Blocking Numbers

In the letter, TIPRA leaders detailed that Maharaja Pradyot Debbarma made over 20 phone calls to the DM to discuss pressing issues like irregularities in MGNREGA implementation, anomalies in CM Rubber Mission beneficiary selection, and delays in constructing forest check dams. All attempts were allegedly ignored, and both Debbarma and CEM Jamatia were later blocked by the officer, further intensifying the Gomati DM controversy.

“This behavior is unacceptable, especially towards a democratically elected leader, the Founder of TIPRA Motha Party, and also a royal scion of Tripura,” the letter emphasized, expressing disappointment and concern over the official’s conduct.

TIPRA Says Gomati DM Controversy Highlights Administrative Arrogance

The letter, signed by a range of public representatives, argues that Chakma’s behavior reflects a broader issue of what they call “administrative arrogance.” It criticizes the IAS officer for undermining democratic principles by neglecting to maintain communication with constitutionally elected bodies.

“The Gomati DM controversy is not just about one incident. It highlights a troubling pattern of neglect and disregard for democratic engagement,” the complaint says. “A public servant is duty-bound to coordinate with elected authorities. Ignoring and blocking them undermines governance and erodes public trust.”

Strong Action Demanded to Resolve Gomati DM Controversy

TIPRA leaders have urged the Chief Secretary to initiate a formal investigation and take disciplinary action against Chakma. They stressed that a “strong message” needs to be sent to uphold administrative discipline and ensure respect for elected institutions.

The complaint also seeks the immediate appointment of a new officer who can collaborate effectively with the region’s elected representatives. “We need someone who values democratic engagement and understands the responsibilities of public office,” the letter asserts.

Signatories Support Inquiry Amid Worsening Gomati DM Controversy

The letter is signed by several prominent political figures, including:

• Brishaketu Debbarma (Minister of State, Industries and Commerce)
• Purna Chandra Jamatia (CEM, TTAADC)
• Philip Kumar Reang (MLA)
• Sapna Debbarma (MLA)
• Nandita Debbarma (MLA, Ramg)
• Rajesh Tripura (EM, TTAADC)
• Debajit Tripura (MDC)

All signatories collectively support immediate action to restore accountability and ensure the Gomati DM controversy is resolved through appropriate administrative channels.

Conclusion: Gomati DM Controversy Raises Serious Governance Questions

As the Gomati DM controversy continues to unfold, it has triggered a public debate on bureaucratic responsibility and the importance of respecting democratic processes in Tripura. With mounting pressure from elected leaders and the public alike, the state administration may soon be compelled to act decisively to restore faith in governance.

The response from the Chief Secretary and any ensuing actions will be closely watched across the state, as the issue touches on not just local administration but also the fundamental dynamics between elected leaders and civil servants.