The political landscape in Tripura is once again stirred by serious allegations concerning Tripura land allotment within the constitutionally protected areas of the Tripura Tribal Areas Autonomous District Council (TTAADC). Pradyot Kishore Debbarman, the influential founder of Tipra Motha, has brought to light claims of illegal land allocation to a foreign national, sparking widespread concern and demanding immediate accountability from state authorities. These allegations strike at the core of land rights for indigenous communities and raise questions about administrative oversight in TTAADC regions.
The Heart of the Tripura Land Allotment Controversy
Pradyot Kishore Debbarman’s accusations center on a specific incident involving the alleged grant of 0.22 acres of land in Khupilang Mouza. This area falls under the Sixth Schedule of the Indian Constitution, a designation designed to safeguard the land and cultural rights of Scheduled Tribes. The land, which should be exclusively reserved for indigenous communities, was reportedly allotted to an individual identified as Dilu Mia, son of Badshah Miah.
The most alarming aspect of this alleged Tripura land allotment is the recipient’s declared nationality. Debbarman provided documentation purportedly showing that Dilu Mia had listed a permanent address in Bangladesh at the time the land settlement was processed. This crucial detail suggests that the beneficiary of this land allotment may be a foreign national, directly violating the protective provisions for tribal lands.
Demands for Accountability in Tripura Land Allotment Cases
The implications of such an illegal Tripura land allotment are profound. Debbarman voiced serious concerns that these improperly acquired land documents could be misused by foreign nationals to obtain Indian identification, including Aadhaar cards and voter IDs. This not only poses a threat to national security but also undermines the very purpose of the Sixth Schedule, which aims to preserve the demographic and land integrity of tribal areas.
In response to these grave allegations, Debbarman has called for stringent action against all officials involved in approving this questionable settlement. He specifically highlighted the need for accountability from revenue and administrative personnel, suggesting that their oversight or complicity allowed this purported illegal transaction to proceed. The demand for transparency and a thorough investigation into the processes governing Tripura land allotment within TTAADC areas is now at the forefront.
Silence from the State Government on Tripura Land Allotment
As of the latest reports, the state government has yet to issue an official response to Pradyot Debbarman’s allegations regarding the alleged illegal Tripura land allotment. This silence has only fueled further speculation and calls from various quarters for a detailed explanation and a commitment to address the issue promptly. The absence of an official statement leaves many questions unanswered regarding the mechanisms in place to prevent such alleged irregularities and the steps that will be taken to rectify them if the claims are proven true.
The controversy underscores the ongoing challenges in safeguarding tribal lands and ensuring that constitutional provisions are rigorously upheld. It highlights the delicate balance between development and the protection of indigenous rights in regions like TTAADC. The coming days are expected to bring more developments as stakeholders await a response from the government and further investigations into this significant matter of Tripura land allotment.
Discover more from RastriyaSamachar24x7
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
