Controversy Grows as Sonam Raghuvanshi to Be Handed Over to Meghalaya Police: UP Police Denies Interrogation

In a developing and controversial case, Uttar Pradesh Additional Director General (ADG) of Law and Order has confirmed that Sonam Raghuvanshi will be handed over to the Meghalaya Police. The statement drew significant attention due to the revelation that the UP Police has not conducted any interrogation of Sonam Raghuvanshi before initiating her transfer.

This surprising move has added fuel to the ongoing debate surrounding police protocol, jurisdictional coordination, and transparency in high-profile investigations.

UP Police Denies Interrogation of Sonam Raghuvanshi

UP ADG Law and Order clarified on Sunday that Sonam Raghuvanshi, who is allegedly involved in a case being pursued by the Meghalaya Police, was not interrogated by the Uttar Pradesh Police during her custody. According to the senior official, the state’s law enforcement authorities acted solely as facilitators and maintained legal procedure while awaiting her official handover.

The ADG further noted that all legal formalities regarding her custody had been completed in compliance with standard protocols. However, the absence of interrogation by the UP Police has raised eyebrows, with critics questioning the depth of coordination and commitment in dealing with such sensitive cases.

Meghalaya Police Set to Take Custody of Sonam Raghuvanshi

Officials from the Meghalaya Police are expected to arrive soon in Uttar Pradesh to take custody of Sonam Raghuvanshi. She will be transported to Meghalaya for further legal proceedings. The reason for Meghalaya’s interest in her case has not yet been officially disclosed, but sources indicate that it is connected to a wider investigation involving state-level implications.

Legal experts say that once Sonam Raghuvanshi is transferred, the Meghalaya Police will be solely responsible for any questioning, custody procedures, or court representations.

Public and Media Reaction to the Sonam Raghuvanshi Case

The news that Sonam Raghuvanshi was not interrogated during her custody in Uttar Pradesh has stirred debate among legal professionals and media commentators alike. Many believe that a primary inquiry by the UP Police could have shed light on any possible connections to local or national elements in the ongoing case.

On social media, public sentiment appears divided. While some users support the UP Police for respecting jurisdictional boundaries, others have expressed concern over what they view as a lack of proactive policing.

Why Sonam Raghuvanshi’s Case Matters

The Sonam Raghuvanshi case is quickly becoming a flashpoint for broader issues in Indian law enforcement, including:

• Inter-state coordination between police departments
• Transparency and accountability in high-profile cases
• Handling of suspects in complex legal matters
• Adherence to procedural justice

While the specific details about her alleged involvement remain under wraps, her swift handover without interrogation suggests that the Meghalaya Police has substantial grounds for requesting her custody.

Legal Observers Call for Transparency

Legal observers and former officers have weighed in on the development, calling for greater transparency in the matter. “While following procedure is crucial, it’s also important that all states involved show a unified front and maintain the integrity of justice,” said a retired DGP who chose to remain anonymous.

The legal community also points out that handing over individuals without initial questioning might set a precedent that could affect future inter-state investigations.

Conclusion: Awaiting Meghalaya Police’s Next Steps

With Sonam Raghuvanshi soon to be in the custody of the Meghalaya Police, all eyes are now on the next legal steps. The handling of her case could serve as an important case study in Indian policing, especially in how states work together in criminal matters.

As developments unfold, the focus will remain on whether due process is upheld and whether the investigation brings clarity to the case in question.