Kharge Slams Modi Over Trump’s India-Pakistan Peace Claims – Exclusive Report

In a powerful and controversial address, Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge has ignited a fresh political storm, sharply criticizing Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s alleged silence and perceived inaction in countering President Donald Trump’s repeated assertions of having brokered peace between India and Pakistan. Kharge’s remarks, delivered during a “Samvidhan Bachao” rally, have brought the sensitive topic of India-Pakistan peace claims back into the national spotlight, prompting a closer examination of diplomatic narratives and domestic political posturing.

The Alarming Core of India-Pakistan Peace Claims

At the heart of Kharge’s scathing attack is Donald Trump’s consistent declaration that he ended a potential war between India and Pakistan. According to Kharge, Trump made this claim an astonishing “16 times,” and in some reports, even up to “21 times,” often linking it to threats of trade disruption. These India-Pakistan peace claims by Trump suggest a direct and decisive intervention that New Delhi has consistently refuted. Kharge questioned why Prime Minister Modi, despite these audacious pronouncements, did not publicly challenge Trump, implying a lack of courage to stand up against a global leader.

“How much does Modi ji and the BJP lie? When the India-Pakistan war was going on, Donald Trump said that he ended the India-Pakistan war, that he told them to stop… Trump said this 16 times. Modi did not respond to him. Why? Because he did not have the courage to speak against Trump,” Kharge asserted, stirring strong reactions among the audience and across political circles.

The Context: Operation Sindoor and Ceasefire

The backdrop to these India-Pakistan peace claims is the heightened tension between the two nuclear-armed neighbors following the ghastly Pahalgam terror attack and India’s retaliatory “Operation Sindoor.” This operation, targeting terror camps in Pakistan, led to a four-day period of intense cross-border military actions. While a ceasefire was eventually reached, India’s official stance has been unequivocal: the understanding on cessation of hostilities was achieved through direct communication between the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of India and Pakistan, with no third-party involvement.

External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar has repeatedly debunked Trump’s narrative. He affirmed that no discussions on trade or American intervention took place during the escalating events. Jaishankar has maintained that India’s position on mediation in its relations with Pakistan remains firm – India will never accept it. This consistent diplomatic clarity stands in stark contrast to Trump’s public boasts and Kharge’s current criticisms, putting the spotlight on the accuracy and implications of such India-Pakistan peace claims.

Modi’s Diplomatic Stance Amidst the India-Pakistan Peace Claims Debate

While Kharge points to a perceived silence, it is important to note PM Modi’s past actions and statements that subtly but firmly rejected external mediation. Reports indicate that during his visit to Canada for the G7 summit, PM Modi had a telephonic conversation with then-President Trump. In that exchange, Modi conveyed that India would never agree to any form of mediation in its bilateral relations with Pakistan. Furthermore, Modi famously declined a dinner invitation from Trump during the same trip, citing a pre-scheduled public program in Odisha and his commitment to the “land of Mahaprabhu.” This diplomatic finesse, while not a direct public rebuttal, served to reaffirm India’s sovereign position on the issue.

However, Kharge’s argument suggests that subtle diplomacy is insufficient when facing such blatant and repeated misrepresentations from a global figure like Trump regarding sensitive matters like India-Pakistan peace claims. He implies that a more forceful and public denial was warranted to uphold India’s pride and sovereignty.

Beyond the India-Pakistan Peace Claims: Kharge’s Broader Critique

Kharge’s address was not limited to the India-Pakistan peace claims. He broadened his attack to other aspects of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government, accusing them of “peddling lies” and prioritizing the wealthy. He criticized the “double-engine governments” for allegedly “giving land to Adani” and selling Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs), contrasting this with the struggles of the poor.

He also connected the political discourse to the preservation of the Indian Constitution, emphasizing its importance for the safeguarding of Dalits, Adivasis, youth, women, and farmers. This highlights a broader political narrative where the Congress party attempts to position itself as the protector of democratic values and the champion of the common person against what it terms the “lies” and “anti-poor” policies of the current administration, especially when discussing sensitive issues such as India-Pakistan peace claims.

The Political Fallout and Future Implications for India-Pakistan Peace Claims

The controversy surrounding Trump’s India-Pakistan peace claims and Kharge’s subsequent criticism is likely to intensify. In an election-bound climate or a period of heightened geopolitical sensitivity, such remarks can resonate deeply with the public. They force a re-evaluation of how India projects its foreign policy and responds to international statements that may misrepresent its diplomatic positions.

The debate underscores the complexities of international relations and the impact of statements made by global leaders. For India, maintaining a clear and consistent narrative on sensitive issues like the India-Pakistan conflict and resisting any third-party intervention is paramount. Kharge’s recent comments serve as a reminder that political leaders, both domestically and internationally, will continue to scrutinize and debate every aspect of these delicate India-Pakistan peace claims.

This ongoing discussion emphasizes the need for transparency and steadfastness in diplomacy, ensuring that India’s sovereignty and strategic autonomy remain uncompromised, regardless of the claims made by any external power. The people of India will be watching closely how this political narrative unfolds and how the government addresses these serious allegations.