Rajnath Singh Declares Pakistan’s Surrender in Op Sindoor – A Decisive Victory

New Delhi – In a significant announcement that reverberated through the Lok Sabha, Union Defence Minister Rajnath Singh declared on Monday, July 28, 2025, that Pakistan “admitted defeat” and offered to cease hostilities during India’s pivotal counter-terrorism operation, Op Sindoor Victory. This revelation marks a monumental moment, underscoring India’s resolute stance against state-sponsored terrorism and showcasing a definitive Op Sindoor Victory.

Understanding the Genesis of Op Sindoor Victory

• Pahalgam Attack Catalyst: The genesis of Op Sindoor Victory lay in the horrific Pahalgam terrorist attack on April 22, 2025, which tragically claimed the lives of 26 innocent individuals. This heinous act prompted Prime Minister Narendra Modi to grant the Indian Armed Forces full autonomy to respond.
• Clear Objectives: Launched on May 6 and 7, 2025, the primary objective of Op Sindoor Victory was not territorial acquisition but the precise neutralization of terror nurseries cultivated by Pakistan. The operation aimed to deliver justice to the victims of cross-border attacks, a clear demonstration of India’s commitment to its sovereignty and anti-terrorism policy, leading to a profound Op Sindoor Victory.
• Targeted Elimination: During Op Sindoor Victory, the Indian Air Force executed strikes on multiple Pakistani airfields and terror infrastructure targets. Over 100 terrorists, including trainers, handlers, and associates from outfits like Jaish-e-Mohammed, Lashkar-e-Taiba, and Hizbul Mujahideen – all openly backed by the Pakistan Army and ISI – were neutralized across nine sites in Pakistan and PoK. This focused approach ensured a strategic Op Sindoor Victory.

Pakistan’s Retaliation and India’s Unyielding Air Defense – A Testament to Op Sindoor Victory

• Failed Counter-Offensive: On May 10, Pakistan attempted a retaliatory assault, deploying missiles, drones, rockets, and electronic warfare technologies against vital Indian assets, including Air Force bases, army depots, airports, and military cantonments.
• Impenetrable Defense: Rajnath Singh proudly asserted that India’s advanced air defense systems—comprising the S400, Akash Missile System, and air defense guns—successfully thwarted every incoming threat. Not a single Indian target was compromised, nor were any crucial assets damaged, reinforcing the comprehensive nature of the Op Sindoor Victory.
• Swift and Precise Response: India’s counter-response was characterized by its swiftness, proportionality, and precision, exclusively targeting elements involved in supporting terrorism, further solidifying the Op Sindoor Victory.

The Concession of Defeat and Ceasefire – A Landmark Op Sindoor Victory

• Pakistan Seeks Truce: Faced with India’s overwhelming response and the effectiveness of Op Sindoor Victory, Pakistan’s Director General of Military Operations (DGMO) initiated contact with India’s DGMO on May 10, requesting a cessation of military operations.
• Formal Agreement: Subsequent formal talks on May 12 led to a decision to pause operations. Singh explicitly clarified that the halt was a result of achieving all political and military objectives, not due to external pressure. This strategic pause cemented the Op Sindoor Victory.
• Conditional Halt: The Defence Minister emphasized that Op Sindoor Victory is merely “paused.” He issued a stern warning that India remains prepared for significantly more intense action should Pakistan dare any future “misadventure,” underscoring the enduring impact of the Op Sindoor Victory.

A New Paradigm in India’s Anti-Terrorism Stance – The Legacy of Op Sindoor Victory

• Tri-services Coordination: Op Sindoor Victory served as a shining example of seamless coordination among India’s armed forces. The Air Force executed aerial strikes, the Army maintained retaliatory vigilance along the Line of Control, and the Navy strengthened its deployment in the North Arabian Sea.
• Zero Tolerance Policy: Under Prime Minister Modi’s leadership, India’s policy is to respond decisively to terrorism rather than tolerate it. Rajnath Singh reiterated that “terrorism and talks cannot go together,” especially with Pakistan, which he branded a “nursery of global terrorism” employing terrorism as a state policy and proxy warfare. This firm stance epitomizes the spirit of Op Sindoor Victory.
• Ideological Warfare: Singh articulated India’s conflict with Pakistan as one of “civilisation versus barbarism,” emphasizing that India’s fight against terrorism transcends mere border skirmishes; it is an ideological battle. The government remains steadfast in its commitment to national unity, integrity, and security, showcasing the far-reaching implications of this Op Sindoor Victory.