Operation Sindoor Debate

Rajnath Singh Slams Opposition Over ‘Operation Sindoor’ Queries in Lok Sabha: A Resounding Defense of National Security

In a powerful address during the ongoing Monsoon Session of Parliament, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh firmly rebuked the opposition’s line of questioning regarding ‘Operation Sindoor’, a decisive cross-border counter-terror operation. His statements, delivered in the Lok Sabha, underscored a critical distinction between responsible inquiry and what he termed as queries that fail to resonate with the nation’s sentiments. The Operation Sindoor Debate has thus taken a sharp turn, highlighting the government’s focus on strategic achievements over operational minutiae.

Prioritizing National Achievements in the Operation Sindoor Debate

  • Critique of Opposition’s Questions: Singh expressed strong disapproval of opposition members asking about the number of Indian aircraft lost during the operation. He stated that such questions did not adequately represent the national mood.
  • Shifting the Focus: Instead, the Defence Minister urged the opposition to inquire about the success of the mission, specifically:
    • Whether India successfully destroyed terrorist bases.
    • Whether Operation Sindoor was a success in its objectives.
    • Whether the “masters of terrorists” responsible for the Pahalgam terror attack were dealt with.
    • Whether any brave Indian soldiers were harmed in the operation.
  • Unequivocal Answers: To these crucial questions, Singh provided clear and emphatic affirmative responses: “Yes” to the destruction of terror bases, the success of the operation, and the neutralization of terror masterminds. He also confirmed “No” to any Indian soldier being harmed. This direct challenge aimed to redefine the narrative of the Operation Sindoor Debate.

The Genesis of Operation Sindoor

  • Pahalgam Terror Attack: Operation Sindoor was launched in the aftermath of a brutal terror attack in Pahalgam on April 22, which tragically claimed the lives of 26 innocent people.
  • Targeted Strikes: The Indian armed forces targeted nine terror hubs across Pakistan-occupied-Kashmir (PoK) and Pakistan, neutralizing over 100 terrorists in a swift and precise operation.
  • Cessation of Hostilities: Following the May 7 operations, India and Pakistan reached a cessation of hostilities understanding on May 10. Singh clarified that this halt was not due to any external pressure, but rather because India had fully achieved its stated political and military objectives. He stressed that any notion of the operation being stopped under pressure was “baseless and completely incorrect.”

Beyond Minor Matters: The Core of the Operation Sindoor Debate

  • Focus on Larger Goals: Rajnath Singh emphasized that when national goals are significant, focus should not be diverted to “comparatively small issues.” He warned that continuous focus on minor aspects could distract from major concerns like national security and the morale and honor of the armed forces.
  • Democratic Responsibilities: The Minister articulated the distinct roles of the ruling party and the opposition in a democracy. While the government’s role is to work in the public interest, the opposition’s duty is to ask necessary questions related to public issues. However, he implied that the questions raised needed to be constructive and aligned with national interest.
  • India’s Decisive Policy: Singh hailed Operation Sindoor as a “historic,” “decisive,” and “effective demonstration” of India’s unwavering policy against terrorism. He paid rich tributes to the armed forces for their valor and dedication.

The Defence Minister’s robust defense has reshaped the ongoing Operation Sindoor Debate, urging a focus on the larger strategic victories and the unwavering spirit of the nation’s armed forces, rather than questions that, in his view, undermine their achievements.

SHARE

Discover more from RastriyaSamachar24x7

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *