Serious Concerns Raised Over US Labeling Pakistan as Counter-Terror Partner Amid Ongoing Cross-Border Terrorism

New Delhi, June 12, 2025 — India has strongly objected to the United States’ recent remarks describing Pakistan as a “counter-terror partner,” emphasizing the continuing reality of cross-border terrorism that continues to claim Indian lives. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) cited the recent terrorist attack in Jammu and Kashmir’s Pahalgam as a stark example of this ongoing threat.

The MEA’s sharp reaction comes in the wake of a US State Department statement that appeared to endorse Pakistan’s role in fighting terrorism, sparking diplomatic unease in New Delhi. The MEA made it clear that India’s experience on the ground paints a drastically different picture — one where cross-border terrorism continues to be orchestrated and supported from Pakistani soil.

Pahalgam Attack: A Painful Reminder of Cross-Border Terrorism

The Pahalgam terror attack, which occurred earlier this week, resulted in the death of multiple security personnel and left several others injured. Indian intelligence agencies have pointed to clear evidence of terrorist infiltration from across the border, making the attack another grim chapter in the long history of cross-border terrorism in the Kashmir region.

“The Pahalgam attack is only the most recent example of what we have been facing for decades now,” an MEA spokesperson said during a press briefing. “This isn’t an isolated incident, but part of a larger and systematic strategy of violence that originates from Pakistan.”

Cross-Border Terrorism Still a Major Threat

India has consistently maintained that cross-border terrorism remains a core issue in its relationship with Pakistan. Despite repeated international appeals, Pakistan’s soil continues to be used by terror outfits like Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed, many of which have openly operated with state support or indifference.

While acknowledging the need for regional cooperation in fighting terrorism, Indian officials have expressed dismay that such cooperation cannot be built on false premises or selective recognition of facts. They warn that any attempt to normalize relations with states that harbor terrorism only emboldens those networks.

US Remarks Create Diplomatic Friction

The US State Department’s praise of Pakistan as a “counter-terror partner” is seen in India as deeply problematic. Indian officials fear that such language, when unaccompanied by ground-level realities, could whitewash Pakistan’s role in exporting terrorism and demoralize nations actively combatting it.

“India has been a consistent and responsible partner in the global fight against terrorism. Our expectation is that our allies will recognize the sacrifices and threats we face due to cross-border terrorism,” said another MEA official familiar with India-US strategic discussions.

Need for Global Accountability

India has long advocated for a global zero-tolerance policy against terrorism. It has urged world powers, especially those with diplomatic clout like the United States, to adopt a more comprehensive and fact-based approach when labeling nations as counter-terror allies.

“Words matter,” said a senior Indian diplomat. “When global leaders call Pakistan a counter-terror partner while India buries its brave soldiers, it sends a deeply demoralizing message to victims of cross-border terrorism.”

Conclusion: Real Actions Must Match Diplomatic Labels

India’s pushback against the US statement reflects not just bilateral discomfort, but a broader concern about the global community’s inconsistent approach toward terrorism. At a time when peace in South Asia is constantly threatened by proxy violence, the Indian government believes it is essential for all stakeholders to take a firm stand based on reality, not rhetoric.

As the situation evolves, India is expected to raise the matter in upcoming international forums and seek greater transparency and accountability on counter-terror efforts worldwide. The MEA reiterated that without acknowledging and addressing the root of cross-border terrorism, regional peace will remain elusive.