Tripura ILP: MLA Ranjit Debbarma Urges Centre for Immediate Implementation Amid Security Concerns

Tipra Motha MLA Ranjit Debbarma has issued a compelling appeal to the Central Government, urging the immediate introduction of the Inner-Line Permit (ILP) system in Tripura. This plea underscores a long-standing demand, critical for safeguarding both national security and the delicate demographic balance of the state. Debbarma, a respected former rebel leader, expressed profound disappointment over the continuous delay in implementing the Tripura ILP, a system that remains absent even after more than three decades since initial discussions.

Why is the Tripura ILP So Critical?

The core of Debbarma’s argument revolves around the severe threats posed by the unchecked influx of illegal migrants into Tripura.

• National Security Concerns: The absence of the Tripura ILP has, according to Debbarma, facilitated large-scale infiltration, directly posing a significant threat to India’s national security. The porous borders and lack of regulatory mechanisms make the state vulnerable.
• Demographic Shifts: Uncontrolled migration has led to considerable changes in Tripura’s demographic makeup, impacting the indigenous communities and their way of life. The Tripura ILP is seen as a crucial tool to regulate entry and residency, thereby protecting local populations.
• Precedent in Sister States: Debbarma highlighted that neighboring states like Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Mizoram, and Manipur have successfully implemented the ILP system. This demonstrates the feasibility and necessity of the Tripura ILP for the region.

A Forgotten Promise: The 1993 Memorandum and Tripura ILP

A significant part of MLA Debbarma’s argument rests on a historical agreement that explicitly mentioned the introduction of the Tripura ILP.

• 1993 Memorandum of Settlement: He referenced the 1993 Memorandum of Settlement (MoS) signed between the Government of Tripura and the All Tripura Tribal Force (ATTF). This document, a cornerstone in addressing tribal concerns, contained a specific clause regarding the ILP.
• Clause 2(e) Explicitly Stated: Debbarma quoted clause 2(e) of the MoS, which clearly states: “The case for introduction of the Inner-Line Permit system would be taken up with the Government of India. The State Government will insist on the Government of India to approve this demand.”
• Disappointment Over Non-Implementation: Despite this explicit commitment, Debbarma conveyed his surprise and dismay that the Government of Tripura has yet to introduce the proposed Tripura ILP system, leaving a crucial promise unfulfilled.

Urgent Action Required for Tripura ILP

The former rebel leader’s appeal is not merely a political statement but a fervent plea for the preservation of Tripura’s identity and security.

• Prompt Intervention Requested: Debbarma has not only addressed his appeal to the Union Home Minister but has also dispatched copies of his letter to the Governor and the Chief Minister of Tripura. This move aims to ensure that all key stakeholders are aware of the urgency and gravity of the demand for Tripura ILP.
• Fulfilling Long-Standing Demand: The introduction of the Tripura ILP is viewed as a vital step towards fulfilling a long-standing demand of the state’s indigenous population and ensuring its long-term stability.
• Securing the Future: Urgent action is imperative to secure Tripura’s demographic balance and internal security, making the Tripura ILP a non-negotiable requirement for the state’s future well-being.

The call for Tripura ILP echoes the sentiments of many who believe that regulated entry and residency are fundamental to preserving the unique cultural fabric and ensuring the safety of the state. As the demand gains momentum, all eyes will be on the Centre and the State Government to see how this critical issue is addressed.